WRInaute discret
Bonjour,
Je me demandais si cela pourrais apporter un plus notable dans le positionnement de la page si par exemple on mettais tout les mots clés dans des balises h1.
Je m'explique : je veut être premier sur le mot clé "motcle1". Bon, je fait ma page normal, j'ai un texte normal... Mais dès que mon mot clé apparait, je le met dans des balises h1, qui ont une classe css qui la fait apparaitre comme du texte. Le visiteur ne voit pas de différence, et google des h1 partout :
exemple :
His name should be spelled "Abailard," but it is as "Abelard" that he is known, Peter Abelard, and just as he was <h1 class="texte">motcle1</h1> wont to distinguish between vox and res, word and reality, we must take into account the difference between the myth or reputation of <h1 class="texte">motcle1</h1> Abelard and what the man really was. The tradition of misspelling his name can be taken as almost symptomatic. Abelard has been for a long time a personality, an interesting, even tragic, character; there is a temptation, which few resist, to take <h1 class="texte">motcle1</h1> sides first and then view the controversies in which he was involved from the vantage point of the <h1 class="texte">motcle1</h1> parti pris. Was he the victim of William of Champeaux, of Anselm of Laon, of St. Bernard of Clairvaux, of the uncle of Heloise? Or was he the victim of his own pride and vanity, of the hubris which seemed to characterize him until his last year? To such questions we
Je me demandais si cela pourrais apporter un plus notable dans le positionnement de la page si par exemple on mettais tout les mots clés dans des balises h1.
Je m'explique : je veut être premier sur le mot clé "motcle1". Bon, je fait ma page normal, j'ai un texte normal... Mais dès que mon mot clé apparait, je le met dans des balises h1, qui ont une classe css qui la fait apparaitre comme du texte. Le visiteur ne voit pas de différence, et google des h1 partout :
exemple :
His name should be spelled "Abailard," but it is as "Abelard" that he is known, Peter Abelard, and just as he was <h1 class="texte">motcle1</h1> wont to distinguish between vox and res, word and reality, we must take into account the difference between the myth or reputation of <h1 class="texte">motcle1</h1> Abelard and what the man really was. The tradition of misspelling his name can be taken as almost symptomatic. Abelard has been for a long time a personality, an interesting, even tragic, character; there is a temptation, which few resist, to take <h1 class="texte">motcle1</h1> sides first and then view the controversies in which he was involved from the vantage point of the <h1 class="texte">motcle1</h1> parti pris. Was he the victim of William of Champeaux, of Anselm of Laon, of St. Bernard of Clairvaux, of the uncle of Heloise? Or was he the victim of his own pride and vanity, of the hubris which seemed to characterize him until his last year? To such questions we
