Voici une liste de metas, lesquels sont utiles (à pat les classiques: title, keywords, description, robots et revisit-after) et lesquels ne servent pas à une meilleure indexation. Mettre trop de metas (inutiles) est ce que cela n'est pas finalement contre-productif ?
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<meta name="title" content="">
<meta name="keywords" content="">
<meta name="description" content="">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Language" content="">
<meta name="robots" content="">
<meta name="Identifier-url" content="">
<meta name="REVISIT-AFTER" content="">
<meta name="expires" content="">
<meta name="rating" content="">
<meta name="distribution" content="">
<meta name="category" content="">
<meta name="MSSmartTagsPreventParsing" content="">
<meta name="DC.Title" lang="" content="">
<meta name="DC.Subject" lang="fr" content="">
<meta name="DC.Description" lang="" content="">
merci
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<meta name="title" content="">
<meta name="keywords" content="">
<meta name="description" content="">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Language" content="">
<meta name="robots" content="">
<meta name="Identifier-url" content="">
<meta name="REVISIT-AFTER" content="">
<meta name="expires" content="">
<meta name="rating" content="">
<meta name="distribution" content="">
<meta name="category" content="">
<meta name="MSSmartTagsPreventParsing" content="">
<meta name="DC.Title" lang="" content="">
<meta name="DC.Subject" lang="fr" content="">
<meta name="DC.Description" lang="" content="">
merci